Alex Kanevsky

INTERVIEW WITH ALEX KANEVSKY (painter of this painting right underneath here)


Q. To what extent does formal training inform what you do? did you study any formal or classical system (such as cast copies or sight-size excercises) at the pennsylvania academy? If so, how far has your process strayed from your training?

A. The formal training was some years ago, so you might say I have strayed quite a bit. When I was at school I did all the casts and site-size exercises and what not, but never very enthusiastically. I pretty much treated classes as opportunities to paint models anyway I saw fit. So I was asked by my teachers several times why was I in their classes in the first place if I ignored the assignments. You know: why paint with limited pallet, for example, just because some guy to told you to do it, when you can use all these colors? I suppose I always thought of good painting as something that happens as a reaction to, not because of schooling.

Q. How do you approach measuring? how about the block in? are you very precise, or are you allowing for correction in subsequent layers? it seems to me this sort of “rubbing out” or painting over without removing the artifacts from the previous layer is key to the richness of the final works. An evidence of process perhaps?

A. I don’t really measure anything. I try go purely by sight. Not because I am so precise, but because I need opportunities to make “mistakes”. Some struggle, conflict with reality is what makes perceptual painting interesting to me. You are right – there is a lot of fast, imprecise painting that goes on with subsequent repainting in hope to find the illusive reality. The evidence is, of course, present in the paintings. They are in some ways diaries of their own creation. If I give them opportunity to get out of control, my work becomes a form of dialogue rather than mere exercise in imposing my will on them.

Q. On your website, you have an interesting section documenting the progression of several paintings. Approximately how long does each session/phase take you? Is the model always there, or do you use photography ever?

A. Each session is between 2 hours and an entire day. This can go on for weeks or even months with interruptions when I loose my way. The models are not always there. Some of the best work happens right after a model leaves for the day, while the memory is still fresh. Depending on the painting it might be purely work with a model or purely from a photo. Or a mix of the both. Photography is very useful, but not as a form of reference. It is mostly useful as a way to remove oneself one step away from my own perception of reality which is colored by all sorts of sentiments.

Q. In criticism, we often ignore the physicality of paint itself. With this in mind, I’m curious about the alchemical mixtures you’re using. what are the ingredients in your paint “soup”? Do you use any industrial (wall) paints? what kinds of mediums if any?

A. There is not much soup. I don’t have secret formulas. Just good quality oil and sometimes alkyd paints, Liquin and sometimes turp. I don’t use any industrial (wall) stuff. I rely on subtle color and texture shifts, and the industrial stuff is formulated for consistency and uniformity. It is hard to push around. Besides, I don’t trust their quality. Judging from my own experiences in house-painting, the manufacturers of the wall painting want you to have to repaint your wall every few years.
Q. what’s your approach to mixing colour? do you mix on the canvas or on the pallette? How many pigments are you typically working with?

A. I try to arrive at canvas (actually, more often board) with a color already well mixed. Then I can see it clearly for what it is. If I am not satisfied with it I will continue to change it, but always by working into it something already mixed. The less you push around the color already on canvass, the fresher it looks. If I can’t get what I want after one or two attempts, I return to it when it is dry. Keeps things fresh.

Q. How deliberate has the journey been in developing your style? did you (and do you) have a clear overarching vision of what you wanted ( a “how to” journey), or was the process more trial and error (a “what if” journey)?

A. I am not interested in style. Style is for fashion designers. They have the problem of maintaining a signature look while trying to fit into this or that general trend. I am interested in neither one of these objectives. If my paintings express my own perception of the world with clarity and commitment, they will always look like they are mine. If my perception or creative process changes, the painting “style” might also change. I just have to let the cheeps fall where they may and deal with consequences.

For each individual painting I have a very clear and concise vision of what it should be. I am committed to it. But, as I said, my work is a form of dialogue, so as a result of my experiences while working on it my vision of what it should be, my ideas of what I want often change quite drastically. There are also times when it becomes clear that what I wanted is impossible, and it has to be abandoned. This is very disappointing and it takes a while to accept the fact. For example, the painting of the male figure in my website’s progression series eventually crushed and burned after two years of struggle.

Q. Who are some of your key influences?

A. Diebenkorn, Morandi, Freud, Rembrandt, Velasquez, Lopez Garcia, Ingres, Kline, Giacometti, Cezanne…

Q. biggest challenge?

A. There are things that appear very difficult if not impossible. I would like one day to try to do a good painting of either Elvis or kittens. At this point i don’t even know where to begin. What I am trying to say that it would be interesting to take an iconic image overloaded with industrial strength sentiment and try to rescue the image, overcoming this sentiment. To distill it free of all ascribed meaning, as it were.

Q. What contemporary artists are you interested in these days?

A. Cecily Brown when she paints well, Hokney’s drawings, Nan Goldin, William Eggleston, Euan Uglow, Sophie Jodoin, Peter Doig, Ann Gale, and many others – in no particular order
Q. Is painting a comforting endeavour, or is it terrifiying? maybe neither? what’s your relationship to the process?

A. Certainly not comforting. Who wants comforting? It is not a sofa. Nor is it terrifying. Painting is not something I do to a canvas. It is a form of conversation, and just like a conversation it can turn out exciting, boring, ugly, beautiful, enlightening. Like a conversation, it can have unexpected turns, sudden discoveries and hidden subtext and periods of silence. All this is what makes painting endlessly fascinating

To see Amore of Alex’s work, visit:

If you are interested in other interviews, go to:

Also be sure to check out the latest Charlie Kaufman film “Synecdoche” which features Kanevsky’s art


30 Responses to “Alex Kanevsky”

  1. Jonny Hargreaves. Says:

    Thanks for asking him some intelligent and revealing questions. Alex’s answers are fascinating and clearly informed by years of hard work and informed reflection on the nature and quality of his superb eneavours.

    I’m glad he likes Uglow and Diebenkorn, I can see traces of it in his painting.

    Regards ~ J.

    • osyrus11 Says:

      It’s funny, you know, I find Uglow’s paintings very informative, like little lessons in colour, they have an elegance to them, and yet they’ve always seemed more lessons than “works of Art”.Admittedly that’s more a feeling than a well analyzed opinion. Still, you can see his influence everywhere.

  2. Aga Says:

    Great interview, thanks for that. I’m a big fan of Alex’s work and I’d like to put the link to this interview on my blog, here:

  3. lucas Says:

    excellent thank you very much! , really!

  4. Cure the Blind » Alex Kanevsky Says:

    […] Another Interview […]

  5. Phil Tyler Says:

    It takes a lot of balls to destroy an image and rebuild it. When you look at Alex’s in progress section you see lots of beautiful finished paintings come and go. Some people would be happy with their first instinct, but sometimes that not good enough.

    Sometimes there’s that frantic need to get work done. You’re coming up to a show deadline, paintings have go to be with the framers, and you dash something off, but it’s a knife edge, either its a gift from god, or two months later it comes back to the studio and seethes it’s venom at you.

    I find Kanevsky’s paintings and absolute joy to look at, they’re very much a painters paintings, but the real dilemma is not how these paintings are made,(they carry the trevail of their making like Diebenkorns ocean park series) but how to make ones own paintings have that same vitality without trying to imitate him.

    • osyrus11 Says:

      No kidding. It’s a very alluring surface. Another painter i interviewed described it as swiss cheese painting. Layers on top of layers with holes so you really see the proccess. The vitality comes from the immediacy of the working method, you can see the wetness, It’s purely direct painting. All the “planning” gets figured out as the work progresses. I think that’s truly whats behind the layering, the trial and error, the history of the surface(That and the subtle colour shifts). What you’re refering to, building and destroying an image, all painters need to have that ability, if it’s too precious you can never finish it properly, don’t you find? I think he keeps this in mind always, Never letting things get too blended or set, it’s that value of immediacy over rendering. That’s what does it for me. A painter who you can tell is beyond being so fascinated with rendering.



  7. free ipad facebook Says:

    apple ipad future…

    Just want to say your article is astounding. The clarity in your post is simply spectacular and i can assume you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with incoming post. Thanks a milli…

    • osyrus11 Says:

      thank you! please help yourself, I have a few interesting articles on the way, hopefully you enjoy them, and I’m always interested in feedback.

  8. Interview with Alex Kanevsky : Painting Perceptions Says:

    […] […]

  9. Says:

    This posting, “Alex Kanevsky Making Art” ended up being beneficial.
    I am making out a clone to clearly show my buddys.


  10. Says:

    This is really the 2nd post, of urs I checked out.
    However , I personally like this specific 1, “Alex Kanevsky Making Art” the very best.
    Take care -Tanja

  11. See more facts about custom Australian jewellery Says:

    Thanks , I have just been looking for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have found out
    so far. But, what concerning the conclusion?

    Are you sure about the supply?

  12. gladiator total body workout Says:

    My spouse and I stumbled over here by a different web address and thought I might check things out.
    I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to going over your web page again.

  13. bloodhounds For sale in georgia Says:

    Hi there i am kavin, its my first occasion to commenting anywhere, when i read this piece of writing i
    thought i could also make comment due to this sensible paragraph.

  14. puppies with worms Says:

    Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d
    like to shoot you an e-mail. I’ve got some creative ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it expand over time.

  15. Alex Taylor Says:

    Normally I do not read article on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very compelled me to take a look at and do so!
    Your writing taste has been amazed me. Thank you, quite
    nice article.

  16. » Virisev kuraator Says:

    […] ja rokib parajasti Ameerikas, on seda suurema osa oma elust vist teinud. On normaalne tüüp, ei aja mingit haiget bläma, on viisakas, helistab tihti emale. Töötab õpetajana, õpilastele meeldib. Ma varastasin talt […]

    • osyrus11 Says:

      Hmmm, google translate informs me that this is Estonian. SOme quick research lead to an article about Kanevsky and another painter, Simon Birch.

  17. Forrest Says:

    Hi to all, how is everything, I think every one is getting more from this web page, and your views
    are nice designed for new viewers.

  18. Write custom research paper Says:

    Thank you for some other great article. The place else
    could anybody get that type of information in such a perfect way of
    writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am on the search for such

  19. Erfahrungen Mit Stealthgenie Says:

    Admiring the commitment you put into your website and detailed information you provide.
    It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same outdated rehashed material.

    Fantastic read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: